kaiyun官方注册
您所在的位置: 首页> 人工智能> 设计应用> 论人工智能在刑事司法决策中的应用
论人工智能在刑事司法决策中的应用
网络安全与数据治理 8期
李容佳
(中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088)
摘要:人工智能在刑事司法领域的应用方兴未艾,世界各国广泛开发人工智能产品,以期提高司法效率,提升司法决策的公平性。然而,人工智能尚处于初级阶段,存在决策偏见、算法黑箱等技术缺陷,并不能做到完全价值中立;人工智能的应用也对传统司法原则和理论造成了冲击,一定程度上威胁到了人权保护。所以,不能盲目夸大人工智能对于司法决策的作用。针对人工智能技术的缺陷,提出要在人工智能产品开发的各个阶段减少决策偏见,推进相关认证标准;对于人工智能的应用问题,首先要明确人工智能只能辅助决策而不能替代决策,其次应加强人类的责任和监管,保障决策的公平性。同时,应加强辩方的数据权利,以实现技术司法模式下的控辩平衡。
中图分类号:D915.3
文献标识码:A
DOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2023.08.004
引用格式:李容佳.论人工智能在刑事司法决策中的应用[J].网络安全与数据治理,2023,42(8):21-27.
On artificial intelligenceassisted criminal justice decisionmaking
Li Rongjia
(School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088,China)
Abstract:The application of artificial intelligence in the field of criminal justice is on the rise, and countries around the world have widely developed artificial intelligence products in order to improve judicial efficiency and enhance the fairness of judicial decisionmaking. However, artificial intelligence is still in its initial stage, with technical defects such as decisionmaking bias and algorithm black box, and cannot achieve complete value neutrality. The application of artificial intelligence also has an impact on traditional judicial principles and theories, threatening human rights protection to a certain extent. Therefore, the role of artificial intelligence in judicial decisionmaking should not be blindly exaggerated. In view of the defects of artificial intelligence technology, this paper proposes to reduce decisionmaking bias and promote relevant certification standards in each cycle of AI development. For the application of artificial intelligence, it must be clear that artificial intelligence can only assist decisionmaking rather than replace decisionmaking. Secondly, human responsibility and supervision should be strengthened to ensure the fairness of decisionmaking. At the same time, the data rights of the defense should be strengthened to achieve the balance of prosecution and defense under the technical justice model.
Key words :artificial intelligence; judicial decisionmaking; human rights protection; balance of prosecution and defense;data rights

0 引言

为了更有效地打击犯罪,提高司法效率,人工智能正被广泛应用于刑事司法中,纵观世界各国,在预测性警务、大数据侦查、审前羁押与保释评估、证据审查判断、司法文书生成、辅助量刑以及假释等领域,人工智能都在发挥或多或少的作用。随着我国《新一代人工智能发展规划》《关于规范和加强人工智能司法应用的意见》《关于加快建设智慧法院的意见》等文件的出台,各地司法机关也积极探索人工智能建设, 上海“206”刑事办案辅助系统、浙江“移动微法院”建设以及杭州互联网法院智审断案等人工智能介入司法决策的应用屡见不鲜。

人工智能的特性意味着它在执行某些任务上远远优于人类,所以在刑事司法系统中使用人工智能会极大提高司法效率,优化诉讼流程,但如果没有合理的规范和适当的监管,人工智能的使用也可能与刑事诉讼法理论相冲突,对人权保护产生严重的威胁。本文拟分析人工智能产品在刑事司法中应用的风险和隐患,论证其对于司法决策的辅助作用,并提出进一步完善的措施。



本文详细内容请下载:https://www.chinaaet.com/resource/share/2000005462




作者信息:

李容佳 (中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088)

微信图片_20210517164139.jpg

此内容为AET网站原创,未经授权禁止转载。
Baidu
map